The Secret Of Life

       The secret of life is that there are no secrets at all. Everything we need to live happy, successful lives is always available to us in every moment. There is no eternal life, nor any past life, that is more important than your life in this moment. Since all other moments are either memory or imagination, that which is eternal exits right now.

Look at the teachings that the Gospel writers attributed to Jesus. Despite the apocalyptic views of John the Baptist, Paul, and the early Christian church, there are major parables of Jesus that do not reflect an apocalyptic view of history, at all. Consider Jesus’ parables of the Samaritan, prodigal son, dinner party, vineyard laborers, shrewd manager, unforgiving slave, corrupt judge, leaven, mustard seed, pearl, and treasure. 

All of these have to do with how to live in God’s kingdom, now. There is no heavenly or hellish eternity, no deceiving or tempting devil, no original sin, nor any need for redemption. These parables are all about how to express unconditional love, now. That is the secret of life.

The only explanation for these teachings being so different from the popular apocalyptic mindset held by many in Jesus’ day, is that this was the message he actually taught. He was different then, and he is still different, even from many Christian churches that claim to follow his teachings. Jesus’ teachings of love, now, were so simple they were not understood by his followers and certainly not by Paul, nor by the members of the churches Paul founded.

The fact that the Gospel writers were compelled to include these contrary teachings in their texts was not unprecedented. The Yahwist strand of written material in the Torah was written about 950 BCE in Jerusalem, the capital city of the Jewish state of Judah. Jerusalem was located in the southern portion of the country. Solomon was king of Judah at the time. The Yahwist materials favored the traditions and institutions of the dominant southern Jewish tribes.

The Elohist strand of material in the Torah was written about a century later, 850 BCE, in the northern Jewish state of Israel, which was created following a civil war in Judah in 920 BCE. The Elohist document included many of the same stories of the Yahwist strands, but editorial changes were made so the new document supported the traditions and institutions of the northern Jewish state, Israel, and actually condemned actions of the southern nation of Judah.

 In 721 BCE the Assyrians conquered Israel and disbursed the northern Jewish population throughout the Assyrian Empire. The remnants of the 10 tribes of Israel simply disappeared from history. Still, the Elohist document survived and found its way south to Judah, where at around 690 BCE it was edited together with the original Yahwist version written in Judah. Instead of editing out conflicting perspectives, however, the editors blended both versions together much as they were originally written, leaving doublet texts in Genesis with which we are all familiar. For example, consider the two different creation stories and the two conflicting stories of Noah. Each had its particular purpose for its intended audience. The same is true for all the other doublets that are found in the Torah.

Jesus was respectful of the Law and the Prophets, but he saw and taught a perspective even higher than the Torah. He taught love, now. His teachings were so strikingly different that his themes and verbal examples were remembered and eventually written down. Just like the Old Testament redactors, the New Testament Gospel writers included Jesus’ teachings of living God’s love now, right in the middle of their own concepts of an apocalyptic universe.

When reading the Bible it is each reader’s responsibility to separate the wheat from the chaff. As you learn more about how and why the documents in the Bible were written, understanding the overall message of the Bible becomes easier. That overall message appears to be that there are no secrets of life, at all, past or present. A final conclusion emerging from Jesus' teachings in the New Testament is, simply, God reigns whenever and wherever love rules.

Life Is A Journey Of Personal Spiritual Discovery

     Probably the most satisfying and the most terrifying aspect of being human is our self-awareness. Because we are self-aware and can hypothesize beyond what we can verify, we seem perfectly willing to create simplistic answers to complex cosmic questions. For example, an interesting cosmic question is, "Why is there suffering on earth?" 

     A simplistic answer might be, "There is a devil tempting us to be selfish and evil toward one another." A more rational approach is that as creatures of evolution, we have an innate drive to dominate and control others. This insures survival, first for ourselves, then secondly, for our families or what we could call our "tribe."

     There is hardly a conflict between neighbors nor a war among nations that is not related, in some way, to an ethnic or cultural conflict. It always seems to be a we/they matter, where what WE think is right and what THEY think is wrong.

     You might ask, what is available to humans to counteract these innate aggressive and self-centered impulses when they are not appropriate? A simplistic answer might be, "God will reward those who are good and punish those who are evil." A more rational perspective is that we are completely capable of recognizing our own destructive, innate behaviors and changing them for the good of all. Our capacity for reasoning can override our survival impulses, if we so choose. The decision each of us makes determines the direction our life goes.  The good news is that each moment is a opportunity to decide anew.

     We cannot eliminate our innate impulses, but we can change our reactions to our own impulses. In fact, this appears to be the foundation upon which religions are based. Religions represent institutional attempts to prompt (shame?) individuals into controlling their survival drives when such impulses are no longer beneficial to society.  This includes the most basic sins involving sex, greed, and envy.

     Unfortunately, church organizations are human institutions and frequently evolve into theological families or tribes that compete with and attempt to dominate other theological families or tribes. They simply mirror the personal drives and impulses of their particular members. Again, the mantra is, WE are right and THEY are wrong. Unconditional love, which is the reality that defines God, is a level of understanding that is higher than the thinking we use to find fault in others or to demand retribution for the perceived sins of enemies.

     This does not mean that participating in church organizations is bad or wrong. God is wherever we are, listens when we speak, and speaks when we quiet our minds. Actually, I feel it is important to have a church home, it's just that each individual is responsible for what he/she believes, not some external church authority. Your most precious beliefs are between you and your experience of God. 

     Church administrative hierarchies are not at that level of understanding. They must reflect and promote the human cultural biases of their members or they risk losing them.  Yes, this creates an insulated, circular system, but in this way the teaching traditions and organizational hierarchy, including jobs, dogma, status, and material wealth are perpetuated.

     All human organizations exist with members serving in core leadership positions. This core is surrounded by an even larger number of peripherally committed members attracted by the presence of the leaders, who are respected as spiritual guides. It is primitive tribal grouping behavior. It's not bad, but it does tend to support organizational growth, and not, necessarily, personal spiritual growth. 

     You learn and grow, spiritually, into the presence of God from within your own mind and heart as an individual. Spiritual growth is not mastering details of doctrine, nor memorizing scriptures or creeds, or expressing Christian apologetics, making public professions of faith, nor accepting dogma because it is written in a particular book or spoken by certain people. Righteousness is not arranging to be seen doing the right things, but rather, it is seeking and knowing the right things to do from within your capacity to love and understand...the link we have with our Creator.

     You grow spiritually by reading, listening, thinking, praying, meditating, deciding, acting, and observing how your world and life change as you make better, more spirit-led choices. What you grow to understand may be in perfect alignment with the teachings of your church, and that is a wonderful experience. If it is not, however, be true to what you have learned from your own spiritual development. It is revealing to you something more important than what your church teaches.

     Interestingly enough, from among the multitudes of religions and denominations around the world, there are individuals who decide to accept responsibility for their own thinking and strike out on their own personal spiritual journeys into the presence of God. They have participated within their institutional home to the point of becoming spiritually aware of themselves and aware of something greater than themselves. And when that awareness occurs, their allegiance to the doctrine and discipline of their religious heritage becomes secondary to their personal spiritual understanding.

     I know this happens, because I have met many such individuals during my life. Our religious backgrounds are very different, but what we have come to understand, as adults, about the world, life, humanity, and reality is strikingly similar. 

     This has confirmed and reconfirmed to me that spirituality is a personal job, within the mind and heart of each of us. A group of independent mystics, regardless of their original theological heritage, will express more unconditional love and unity among themselves than will members or leaders committed to specific religious organizations. The fact that religions are "organized" means that membership in them is "conditional." Jesus never taught anything like that.

     Still, yes, participate in churches or religious organizations that are meaningful to you. God is wherever you seek. Find and rejoice in a religious family and support ministries as you see fit, but realize all along that your true spiritual journey is guided by however you experience God's presence and in that presence we are all one.

     

Thanks, To My Fundamentalist Friends

     Years ago, I gained new friends in an organization of primarily fundamentalist Christians. Throughout my life, fundamentalists have appeared to me to be somewhat bipolar. On the one hand, better people you could not hope to find. They will care about you and for you without question, except, perhaps for the obligatory probe, “Have you accepted Jesus Christ as your personal savior?”

      Basically, they are wonderful, honest, helpful, kind, patriotic, loving, and family-oriented individuals. However, whenever the discussion turns to religion, from the depth of his or her being there arises a cynical, judgmental, assertive, and intractable presence that hovers over the conversation like a vulture awaiting the death of all living opposition. As I said, it can be an almost shocking change in the social atmosphere.

     Despite disagreements on issues of theology, I doubt neither the sincerity of their Christian faith nor the depth of their concern in trying to save me from my own way of thinking. It was suggested that I read the Bible again and meditate on it. I said that I would and I did. After my reading and meditation, I felt even more strongly that many specific sections of the Bible directly contradict other sections in both the Old and New Testaments. There are, also, many sections that directly refute their fundamentalist dogma.

     Feeling a need to study the Bible more carefully, I started reading what Biblical scholars have to say about how the Bible was written, assembled, and interpreted. I am grateful that my friends had suggested I look at the Bible anew.

     Much to my astonishment, what I had noticed as a non-expert Bible reader, is already well known and has been thoroughly studied and discussed for centuries. Bible research, discussion, and debate is continuing right into the 21st century.

     It seems to me that there are two major contrasting perspectives from which the Bible has been viewed and interpreted through the ages. One is what has been called the prophetic view and the other is the apocalyptic perspective.

     The apocalyptic viewpoint assumes God’s imminent return by a direct, supernatural intervention to place his final messiah into power to rule over the end of the human domination systems that exist and to make final judgment on every soul. The origin of this kind of thinking comes from Jewish traditions several centuries preceding Jesus. 

     "Messiah" comes from the Hebrew word māshīach, which means “anointed.” This was the title given to all the kings of the Jewish nation. Saul was the first anointed king of the Jews (messiah), but he was unable to unite the various Jewish tribes. However, the second messiah, King David, through his military and political skills, did establish a strong and prosperous Jewish nation over which he reigned for 40 years. One of his sons, Solomon, was the third king (messiah) and he ruled successfully for another 40 years. This was the foundation for the thinking that successful messiahs could be expected from the line of David.

     Centuries later, after being defeated as a nation and oppressed by other countries for generations, there seemed no hope that a new messiah could arise from within the remnants of the Jewish nation. Gradually the expectation grew that God would have to directly intervene in world events to provide his chosen people with a messiah, in the tradition of David, who would bring forth God's final kingdom and rule on earth. This is why John The Baptist was calling for Jews to repent, for the day of the Lord was coming.

     Into this atmosphere Jesus arrived with a message that had an unexpected, non-apocalyptic angle. His message of love and ethical conduct is based on the prophetic viewpoint, first articulated by ancient Jewish prophets. Jesus' parables and sayings suggest that righteous motives from within are what please God. Jesus taught that to conform to religious law and rituals has its place, but external appearances are secondary to inner attitudes and behavior based on unconditional love. Recall Jesus’ ethical reconstruction in his Sermon On The Mount of the laws of Moses.

     Jesus’ teachings strongly state that God’s desire for loving behavior (righteousness) from human kind is ever-present and meeting this expectation is all that is necessary to enter into His kingdom on earth. This perspective is expressed in Hosea 6:6, and echoed in Matthew 9:13, and Matthew 12:7. Jesus’ teaching that the kingdom of Heaven is ever present and within mankind’s reach or “at hand” as written in Matthew 4:17 (RSV) clearly indicates the prophetic viewpoint. Through either the Aramaic or Greek language, whichever was used by Jesus, the meaning of that passage is unambiguous. The Kingdom of God is specifically available now.

     Despite this emphasis by Jesus, Paul and other early members of the developing Christian communities appeared to revert to an apocalyptic view after Jesus was gone. Plus, they expanded their mission to include people beyond the Jewish nation, which actually was consistent with Jesus' teachings. Since their message found willing listeners among the gentiles (pagan non-Jews) this helped alter the purpose of the anticipated apocalypse. 

     Former pagans had little interest in reviving the Jewish nation on earth, but they did have interest in saving themselves from the idea of an afterlife in hell. This was a doctrine perfect for the pagan mindset. We must remember that pagans constituted more than 90% of the general population. As a result mystical, magical polytheism was commonplace thinking, even for Christians. 

     In fact, there were numerous Christian centers of teaching that were polytheistic. One Christian group believed that the God of the Old Testament was angry and vengeful but a different God, described in the New Testament, was kind and redeeming. Other Christian groups claimed there were as many as 365 different gods. All these groups claimed to be Christian.

     This resulted in considerable infighting among the various Christianity’s during the first couple of centuries. Each saw themselves as the true believers and the others as heretics. It is clear that paganism had a profound impact on the direction and course of Christian theology.

     What is so amazing is that the common thread of Jesus’ prophetic viewpoint was maintained in the Bible, across the gospels, despite the apocalyptic notions of the writers and followers of the gospels. The biblical scholars believe this happened because both Jesus’ disciples and the leaders/teachers that followed them (e.g. Paul) did not fully understand what Jesus was teaching.

     You might recall their lack of understanding was frequently reported in the gospels. What Jesus taught was so different from what they were expecting, yet so closely tied to familiar Old Testament teachings, that they were simultaneously spellbound, uplifted, and perplexed. Still, after Jesus was gone, they just couldn’t seem to free themselves of the need for something apocalyptic to occur, despite the clear prophetic message in Jesus’ teachings.

     Paul, too, seemed affected by both Jesus’ teachings of love as well as Paul’s own background of dedication to every detail of Jewish law. Law and doctrine were at the foundation of his very being. When he had his spiritual awakening, he may have changed his spiritual view of Jesus’ role as redeemer, but not his need for strict religious discipline. The topics in his writings vacillate between beautiful expressions of Jesus’ prophetic message and detailed, legalistic explanations of proper Christian theology, unlike anything Jesus would have ever said about himself.

     Despite this obvious clash of perspectives, even today fundamentalists appear to accept Paul’s apocalyptic perspective and dogma on faith, as opposed to Jesus' teachings and feel no need to explain or defend their decision to do that. In fact, I was told that Christian doctrine cannot be debated or rationally explained. It must be accepted on faith. 

     This stretches the meaning of “faith” beyond all limits. You can learn arithmetic and have faith in your ability to perform arithmetic calculations that you have never seen before. But how can you have faith in irrational doctrine and traditions that cannot be objectively confirmed through life events and which you must simply memorize? That does not demonstrate faith. That demonstrates obedience to what you have been taught and fear toward thinking differently. That is not developing faith. It is, rather, relenting to the propaganda of your own human heritage. There is a time for each of us to take on the responsibility for our personal spiritual thinking and development. When that moment occurs your journey of faith has truly begun. 

     My fundamentalist friends don’t seem to read the Bible to consider the accuracy or consistency of its contents. They simply assert there are no problems, no contradictions, then interpret the Bible however they wish. They continue to assert a lot of things, such as the inerrancy of the Bible, the need for literal interpretations including the stories of creation, heaven, hell, the devil, etc. which they accept ‘on faith.’ If fundamentalist Christian beliefs are considered the ‘orthodox’ beliefs for Christianity, then even Jesus could not qualify to be a Christian.

     Even though my Christian beliefs appear to contrast sharply from my fundamentalist friends, they are spiritual Truth to me. I have lived them by applying them to the practical activities of my life and they have always provided better answers than I could have ever discovered on my own. 

     When you turn the other cheek in real life, it totally changes what’s happening and what others expect, and different outcomes result. Approaching people of different cultures, races, sexual orientation, etc. with an attitude of complete acceptance changes the dynamics of such encounters in ways that can easily lead to the resolution of conflicts. Applying Jesus’ teachings to everyday activities just hasn't failed me. I’m hooked and cherish dearly what I have learned from His teachings and example. I am compelled to hold firm to my Christian beliefs until God leads me through life experiences to even higher understandings.

     I make only one demand of you, my fundamentalist friends. Just as I will always respect your right to practice apocalyptic Christianity as you understand it, (e.g. the teachings of Paul), I ask that you, also, respect my right to practice prophetic Christianity as I understand it (e.g. the teachings of Jesus). I must also thank you for prompting me to journey again through the Bible. It has meant more to me than you could ever imagine.

Love Was Jesus' Only Message

Consider Jesus’ parables. When you really think about their practical implications, you realize Jesus’ only message was offering us practical hints on how to love one another.  According to Jesus, successfully doing this places us in God’s presence. That’s it. All the ideas like Mary being a virgin mother, Jesus rising from the dead, his resurrection representing atonement for original sin, and the importance of the trinity represent human theology developed, debated, and modified years, decades, and centuries after Jesus taught only love.

Conservative Christian theology has its purpose. It provides a basis for church organization, discipline, and materialistic growth.  It asserts that the Bible is “God’s word” and therefore “perfect, complete, and infallible.” From these common basic and untenable assumptions, each fundamentalist Christian institution then interprets the Bible however it wishes and behaves as if its interpretation is the only true version of “God’s word.”  Statements of Christian dogma then propose to answer human questions like, “What is the purpose of life?” and “What happens to me after I die?”

Many have been so totally immersed in conservative theology for so much of their lives there is little chance they could ever evaluate what they say they believe from a rational viewpoint.  I would suggest those individuals stay right where they are if that is where they feel comfortable. My only caution is that whatever they are taught they should do to "save" those they define as "non-believers", does not come from the teachings of Jesus.

All the New Testament authors were different. Paul did not say the same things as Mark, Luke, Matthew, or John. Later on, scribes altered Bible passages to fit the Christian theology of their day. Then the whole Christian movement was thoroughly shaken up and modified to suit the religious whims of Constantine, the 4^th Century emperor of Rome. The Christian sect he supported ended up defining orthodoxy. All the other Christian organizations, and there were many, were outlawed, attacked, and eliminated.

There are practically as many theological viewpoints in the Bible as there are authors. But the teaching voice of Jesus, somehow slips around and through all the verbal battles about doctrine letting his singular message of love survive.

I would like to suggest that each of us knows exactly how to demonstrate unconditional love and compassion in every situation we face in life. We know it, but we can't (won't) do it. We “sin” constantly because we convince ourselves it is  important to exclude from our unconditional love those people we don't like or actually hate. We want our family, our tribe, our personal cultural and our religious views to be better than all others.  Self-centeredness is the primary motivation behind most human acts of evil.

           We make exceptions to Jesus' example of unconditional love so we can blame our personal feelings of unworthiness, temptation, fear, anger, hate, jealousy, envy, greed, and regret on others.  Jesus taught that we should replace these self-centered emotions with an understanding of God that allows love to dominate. It works in simple, practical ways every time we seek loving solutions. Of course, we are also free to ignore his teachings.

It is so strange that Christian dogma which originally derived from the teachings of love, has devolved into fearing, rejecting, and shunning fellow humans  because they are different. Jesus never met a person he could not accept. We all understand this and agree that this is a true reflection of Jesus’ view of life, but immediately we tend to turn around and reject those who don't look, talk, act, or believe as we do.

When you accept the dogma of a human religious institution then you, yourself, are accepted by those already in that institution and you are made to feel welcomed. You become a respected member of the "club." You learn the words, the phrases, the nods and the winks that link you together. This does provide a community in which to experience and celebrate life. 

          But if your church membership pulls you away from what you know is the loving spiritual message taught by Jesus, you  have a decision to make. Which outcome is most important to you? Is a successful spiritual life attained by building barriers around God's love, to protect it from the unworthy? Or is it more important to remove barriers so all are seen as God's children?  That is a personal decision each of us must make on our own.

My rational mind and the spiritual experiences I have had during my lifetime tell me that personally seeking out the practical results of Jesus' teachings of love is the right direction to go. This leads an individual to a personal confirmation of the laws of love and frees him/her from the dictates of dogma. Dogma chains you to law, intolerance, and the status quo. Love frees you to discover, learn, and grow. 

          Jesus taught love.

Christmas Is More Important Than Irrational Religious Fantasy

      Are babies really as cute as “buttons” or some people as mean as “dogs?” Are there really doctors or ministers or holy men who are “miracle workers” and are there times we are all as happy as “larks?” There is hardly a human sentence uttered that is not somehow embellished by imagination and fantasy. In almost every sentence we appeal to fantasy to express that which we would have to otherwise struggle to say directly.

        Religions in particular depend upon fantasy because the purpose of religion is to provide answers to questions that cannot be answered directly, like “What is God?” or “What happens to me after I die?” Even though human intelligence is remarkable, it is limited and we are not capable of understanding reality beyond our limit. We are, however, capable of fantasizing answers to those questions, as were our ancestors, since the first of them became self-aware.

        As a result, all religious dogma, all professions of faith and all systems of theology are firmly founded on fantasy. However, some flights of fantasy can be evaluated and confirmed through our human and world experiences to be true or false.  Einstein essentially fantasized his theory of relativity because it was not derived directly from accepted theories of his day. His concepts seemed to come straight out of nowhere….fantasy. However, tests of his theory showed it to be true, for the most part, and it will gradually be improved and restructured as more is learned.

        The same is true for the fantasy behind most religious beliefs. It can be studied and confirmed as true or false, if those holding those beliefs would allow such scrutiny. The fact is, most do not, so the validation of religious beliefs lags the scientific community by hundreds, if not thousands of years. This leads to bizarre religious beliefs in fantasies such as virgin births and bodily resurrections of the dead which all of us understand are not confirmed or validated by anything we experience in our daily lives.

        This means the role of religious doctrine is not to express truth that can be confirmed by 21st century thinking, but to hold to irrational fantasies created by 1st century thinking before secular validation was possible.

        For me, such fundamentalism diminishes the meaning of Christian teachings to the point they have little practical value except to justify idol worship of  Jesus, God, the Bible, and all things considered holy for fear of retribution. For me, the deepest sense of human faith comes from realizing and accepting the fact there is only one reality and any separation of the spiritual from the scientific is an illusion. Rationality is the truth that sets you free to experience God, the foundation of life, in every moment.

      The fact is, however,  that invalid and irrational religious fantasy remains important to millions of people, of many religions, around the world. It appears to represent a stage of human spiritual evolution through which humanity must pass, but apparently, not quickly.

        It has been my experience that those individuals who are open to personal spiritual inquiry are able to look beyond the religious traditions of their family (tribe) without fear.  They tend to become more universal in their outlook and also tend to find themselves in close agreement with each other when by chance they meet. This seems true even when their religious beliefs as youngsters would have created serious conflicts among them.

        Personal spiritual inquiry appears to be how we as individuals move beyond institutional religion, particularly fundamentalism, and become responsible for our own sense of spirituality and faith. So, until religious organizations and family traditions change to support this growth of spirituality from within, the familiar traditions of religious fantasy and unyielding obedience to dogma will fill that void. In general, this is neither good nor bad, it is just where fundamentalists are in their thinking.

          It becomes negative and harmful, however, when fundamentalists and evangelicals become dogmatically political in order to force everyone else to live in accord with the institutional dogma they have accepted. If you look carefully at the political actions of socially conservative politicians it is clear that their collective goal is to force everyone else to look and act "Christian" (as they define it) by creating civil laws that abolish the most basic of individual freedoms; the freedom to control one's own body and mind. It's as if their mission is to create a repressive and punitive "Christian" police state, totally lacking compassion or love.

        Jesus did not teach dogma and did not want to be worshiped as a holy object. He invited us to follow his example and live as love expressed; the exact opposite of a theocracy that demands civil obedience to religious dogma. Worshiping Jesus as an idol shows we understand that his teachings were special, but it misses the core of his mission which was for us to gain personal wisdom far higher than icon worship. He invited us to seek, find, understand, and use our own Christ potential..."Seek first the Kingdom of God." I have always felt that the birth of the Christ spirit into human consciousness and within our hearts as individuals is the true mission of Christianity and the true meaning of Christmas.

      Having faith is something more important than joining popular religious bandwagons or pledging yourself to publicly express "Christian" talking points. It is withdrawing from the world and being touched by the peace and love of God in the solitude of your own heart and mind, then sharing your insights through living a God-filled life. That is what Jesus did. Life itself is the only miracle we have to experience and loving others is the only spiritual skill we need to master.

        This year may your Christmas experience be all that love is.

Love… The Only Fundamental Required To Be A Christian

Since the dawn of humanity we have struggled to define the spiritual meaning of our existence. Now, in the 21^st Century we are aware of several things:

1.    We do exist and live in a wonderful and complex earth in a solar system that is part of a universe filled with uncountable numbers of galaxies.

2.   We are self-aware. We have memory and are capable of rational thought, recall, and foresight. 

3.   Despite our capabilities everything we understand still seems to us to be related to something even higher than ourselves. We feel this because here we are, aware that we exist in a universe of spectacular structure, function, and life, somehow created, but not by us.  The name Christians give to the prime creator of all reality is  “God.”

The human mind rejects uncertainty, so there has been no lack of effort by humans to define God and God’s purpose for mankind despite our inherent inability to do precisely that. Religion is a creation of the human mind as our effort to eliminate uncertainty about life and God. Religious dogma, however, appears to reveal more about human anxiety than it does about God. Still, religion can and does help many of us discover our personal awareness of God, but the final truth is that God resides above and beyond religion.

Interestingly enough, if we bring to each moment unconditional love toward all who are with us in that moment, God is present, and any need to define God further, disappears. Positive solutions emerge and life improves. This is the practical truth  Jesus  taught about how God touches and influences human life.

Other concepts of God are presented in the Bible.  It is filled with many different human imaginings of God. Consider the following:

God As A Human Being: Genesis 3:8-9 “And they heard the sound of Lord God walking in the garden in the wind of the day, and the human and his woman hid from Lord God among the garden’s trees. And Lord God called the human and said to him, “Where are you?”   

In this case God “walks” around Eden and then doesn’t know where Adam and Eve are when they hide and God must call out. This is a portrayal of God as a human being, and clearly not omniscient.

God Speaking Through Angels In Dreams: Genesis 31:11 “And an angel of God said to me in the dream, ‘Jacob.’ And I said, ‘I’m here.’       Matthew 2:20 “But when he had considered this, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying…”    

Dreams can be so vivid and real, it is understandable that dreams would be one of the means by which Gospel writers expressed spiritual communication from God to humans. They’re probably right.

God As A Voice From Heaven:  Mark 1:10-11 “…he saw heaven being torn open and the Spirit descending on him like a dove. ¹¹ And a voice came from heaven: ‘You are my Son, whom I love; with you I am well pleased.’ ”   

In the 1^st Century, it was believed that the universe consisted of three tiers, the underworld, the earth surface with all its features and inhabitants, and heaven or the realm of God (or gods) in the sky just above a dome that covered all the earth. Some even believed that stars were really windows in that dome through which the gods looked down on earth to keep watch on humans.

The author of Mark was suggesting that the baptism of Jesus symbolically tore apart this wall that separated heaven from earth.  This was an effective way of expressing the idea that Jesus lived in conscious oneness with God during his life on earth. By following Jesus’ teachings and example we can  tear down the barrier separating us from God. This is a powerful spiritual lesson and its meaning is lost if the text is interpreted as merely a record of a historical event.

There Is A True God…but for the most part we humans cannot begin to understand the boundaries of God’s reality. However, thanks to the Age of Enlightenment (1600’s-1800’s) and all the scientific discoveries since then, we understand our universe, our world, our bodies, our lives, and our environment so much better than did the ancient writers of scripture. 

Science and Spirituality Are The Same Truth:  It is popular to suggest that spiritual truth and scientific truth are different and that spiritual truth has dominion over the scientific. However, there is only one reality and science and spirituality are two aspects of this singular truth.  

           It does seem, however, that spirituality provides the inspiration for all possibilities (real and unreal) and that science provides objective confirmation of which of all possibilities are real. Inwardly we live in a personal reality constructed by the thoughts we choose. Outwardly, as a society, we live in a reality confirmed by experience and experimentation. 


           The less conflict there is between your inner thoughts and what your outer experiences confirm, the less you experience fear and the stronger is your sense of  faith.

There can be only one ultimate truth and we all basically understand that. Insights into significant scientific theories have come from experiences that were highly spiritual.

For example, Einstein’s theory of relativity was not a rational extension of the scientific knowledge of his time.  He came up with something  new and unexpected. He described his insights as occurring during moments of “reverie.”  They occurred when he was apart from the work-a-day world, thinking and meditating.

When you are exploring the limits of human knowledge, it frequently leads to spiritual insights. Science and religious faith are not mutually exclusive. They are related expressions of the same reality…life.

Once hypotheses (explanations of events) are proposed, the role of the scientific method is to help determine which one of all the proposed hypotheses best explains the events under observation. That’s it, and that’s true for rocket science, too.  Rigorous science reveals truth (what we accept as theories) because it is human bias free. That is why it is so powerful and useful.  

It is also possible to scientifically study the results of one’s faith or spiritual beliefs. It is already known that prayer and meditation lower stress in humans which leads to healthier, happier lives.

Changes in disease states can, also, be monitored before and after spiritual treatments and their effectiveness verified. Of course it is difficult to set up such studies because most religious groups are not interested in the scientific analysis of matters of faith, but, the fact remains, it can be done.

If human knowledge and life events are not consistent with predictions based on one’s religious faith, then it is the faith system that is in error, not life.

The Bible Did Not Exist Until The 5th Century CE:  We must remember that all the manuscripts that ended up being in the Bible were written for reasons that had nothing to do with specifically creating the Bible.   In fact, there were many additional early gospels and documents written, which, for various reasons of theology, didn’t make the final cut.

The books to become the Bible were known as a collection by the 3rd century, but they were not canonized by church leaders until the 5th century of the Common Era (CE). They held a conference, had contentious debates and voted on which ancient writings were to be sacred and which were not. Human minds created the concept of "the sacred Bible." Even then, many decades of bitter political debate followed, as Christian assemblies considered heretical were attacked. and scattered. The books that won the "orthodox" label were the favorites of the men with the most power at the time.  

The Book Of Revelation Was Not Popular: Not all the writings included in the Bible were considered equal in value. Many early church leaders considered the book of Revelation unworthy of the status of sacred scripture. Its ultimate inclusion was probably more a result of compromise than of wide spread respect.

It is an odd book in the New Testament. It is a sample of carefully encrypted apocalyptic literature, but the specific community and situations and characters to which its symbols apply are unknown, making precisely accurate interpretation impossible.  Suggesting that passages from the book of Revelation contain predictions of modern historical events is beyond meaningless; it is bizarre. 

The Bible Is The Word Of Men: The ideas that the Bible is without error and was dictated by God are not supported by anything we know or experience, except hearsay, when we are told what we must believe. Many do act as if the Bible were the word of God and combine passages of scripture from here and there to bolster their own feelings of fear, hate, or prejudice. In this way they pretend to avoid responsibility for their own actions.

Such pious, self-centered behavior is the very attitude exhibited by the priests and Pharisees of Jesus’ time. It is precisely what Jesus taught against (see Matthew 23:22-24) and his opposition resulted in his crucifixion.

There was no Christianity during Jesus’ lifetime; he and his disciples were devout Jews. But, after his death, his followers found strength in the memory of his loving example and dedicated themselves to living as Jesus had demonstrated as members of the Jewish sect known as The Way.

So, rejecting legalistic conformity to Jewish law and living with unconditional love in their hearts and actions towards anyone and everyone was the goal of the proto-Christian assemblies (followers of The Way) emerging a few decades after Jesus died.

In contrast to that, present day Christian fundamentalists are devoted to strict conformity to church doctrine that does not conform to the actual teachings of Jesus. Fundamentalist dogma arises from the teachings of religious institutions such as the Roman Catholic Church and from individuals such as John Nelson Darby, a 19th century proponent of  "dispensational premillennialism." 

Darby's teachings were reinforced by the pseudo-scholarly Scofield Reference Bible completely based on premillennialism to the exclusion of any references to the findings of prominent Biblical scholars.  There is nothing in life that supports the validity of dispensational premillennialism beyond personal opinion. It is an idea with no demonstrated substance.

         Still, the certainty that fundamentalism asserts resonates with many rural populations made anxious by the rapid growth of scientific knowledge and changes in urban culture.    As a result, Christianity, as defined by fundamentalists and evangelicals from late in the 19th Century, represents a radical departure from what was considered traditional Christian spirituality prior to the 19th Century.

Sacred Teachings: The Bible is a human document, created, manipulated, changed, and canonized by political and religious leaders. However, this does not diminish its role as a book of significant spiritual importance over the millennia.

Can anyone read the Great Commandment and the parable of The Good Samaritan, which Jesus used to interpret its universal meaning (Luke 10: 25-37), and not realize the Bible contains important instructions for human living and spiritual completeness?

No miracles are required by anyone to understand Jesus’ parables and sayings. They strike us as fundamentally true. Jesus’ teachings are remarkable for their simplicity and profundity. Love was his only message…with no exceptions.

The Purpose Of Life: As Jesus taught it, learning to live with unconditional love in your heart toward everyone, just as he demonstrated, is all that is required for one to enter the Kingdom of God. Doing so creates a perfect balance of God, mind, and action. It is as easy to say as it is difficult to do, but that is our goal as children of God. This is the only fundamental belief required of anyone professing to be a Christian, or, for that matter, a spiritually enlightened member of any religious tradition.

Life Is About Learning To Love

I was fortunate to have been exposed to a progressive Christian environment when I was a child. When I asked questions such as “Did Jesus really walk on water?” or “Did Jesus really die, then come back to life after three days?” the usual response I heard was “What do you think?” Then I would talk with my parents or Sunday school teachers about what I thought. I am so grateful for these conversations, because by doing that they were teaching me how to love.

Love, for me, is accepting others completely as they are, just as I was accepted, with no judgment based on what I believed. I even learned that I could be truthful to people who lied to me, generous to those who stole from me, and faithful to those who betrayed me without my sense of God changing one bit.  These are the kinds of lessons you learn by applying the teachings of Jesus to the life situations you experience. Time and again I was surprised to discover how accurate the wisdom of Jesus’ teachings really is.

I still remember the moment I realized that applying the Golden Rule to help resolve life’s problems, works whether or not you believe Jesus walked on water, or  whether or not you believed he physically came back to life after being crucified. When you understand the spiritual truths to which Biblical metaphors point, then the question of whether or not Bible stories represent actual historical events is no longer relevant. I also realized that spiritual understanding and faith cannot come from merely believing in history anyway. Faith develops as you notice changes in your own life events that result directly from relying on higher, more universal truths.

When this understanding occurred, it was an “Aha” moment for me and it happened when I was a teenager standing  in the hallway of the old wooden Sunday school building of our Methodist Church in Annandale, Virginia. At that moment it was clear to me that whatever is spiritual and true is between an individual and his/her experience of God. I look back at that moment as the beginning of my personal search for a spiritual experience with God. It was a feeling of putting away “childish things”; what I had been told I could believe by others (including my parents, siblings, ministers, and Sunday school teachers) and taking responsibility for the evolution of my own spiritual awareness.

This search has led me to the understanding that God is love and love is a spiritual reality you can bring to awareness each moment of your life. Love does not require any specific set of acts, but rather simply appears when your conscious awareness of each moment includes God’s presence. I am no longer interested in being for or against others because they are Americans or foreigners, straight or homosexual, wed or unwed mothers, Republicans or Democrats, liberal or conservative. None of that matters in the presence of love.

Jesus was a radical teacher of the power of love.  He worked to fill his followers with the awareness of God’s presence and free them from the human sense of futility they experienced from the political-religious domination system of their day.  As Jesus demonstrated, we must be willing to dine with anyone, and still be true to ourselves and  God.  Only then might we be able to move with others toward the freedom and happiness we all seek, independent of circumstances.

Each of us wants to live a meaningful life, which requires we acknowledge and respect traditions or relationships that are meaningful to others. Love requires respect even when you don't personally understand others or cannot accept their standards in living your own life. Still, we have all evolved from the same source of life. We are all expressions of God’s truth and have the option to become one with it.  

          Efforts to describe our purpose in detail greater than this lead to unlimited opportunities for error. Consider the following. Can fish understand the realm of horses? Can horses understand the realm of mankind? Can mankind understand the realm of God? The answer is the same for all. Yes, we can understand the limited ways other realms touch us, but most of what is true outside our own realms is beyond our ability to grasp.

          An attitude of love puts us in the best position to learn all that we can and to accept whatever is beyond our awareness. An attitude of love is the foundation for faith.